SAM IS ....
Misuse of Civilian Drones

Drones (also known as unmanned aircraft) are flying systems that do not carry a pilot. As the technology has become cheaper and more sophisticated, the use of drones for recreational and commercial purposes has grown, with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) reporting a significant increase in the number of permissions obtained for operating commercial drones in the UK. Despite their potential to reduce costs, improve efficiency and provide new services, drones may be misused accidentally or for malicious purposes. For example, reports of drone sightings at Gatwick Airport in December 2018 grounded around 1,000 flights for almost 36 hours, affecting more than 140,000 passengers. In 2018, the Government introduced new limits on where drones can be flown and new registration and education requirements for drone operators and pilots. In January 2020, the new Government introduced an Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Bill to Parliament that included new police powers for enforcing aviation laws (such as the power to issue a fixed penalty notice for certain drone offences). This POSTnote looks at civilian drones and their applications, focusing on potential misuse and possible responses.

Jump to full report >>

Misuse of civilian drones

Drones can be particularly useful in remote, inaccessible or dangerous settings. Some of the current applications of drones include: photography and filming for research, inspecting infrastructure for wear and damage, and emergency response, including to aid search and rescue and provide surveillance of a disaster area. While they have many benefits, the speed, low cost and increasing flight range and capacity to carry items can also make them attractive to people who may use them maliciously, recklessly, negligently or with criminal intent. Examples of their misuse include causing disruption to other aircraft, intrusion of privacy through filming people without permission, facilitating physical or cyber-attacks, and enabling other criminal activity (such as flying contraband into prisons).

Key points:

  • Drone use is growing, with one projection suggesting that more than 76,000 drones, operated by government and commercial organisations, may be in use in the UK by 2030.
  • Greater drone use affords many potential social and economic benefits. For example, they are being used for environmental monitoring and to support search and rescue teams.
  • Despite this, drones may be misused accidently or deliberately, presenting new challenges for safety and security.
  • There are a variety of technological ways of addressing drone misuse. They include those built into drones, and those that can detect, track, seize, disable or destroy drones posing a threat.
  • Detecting a drone’s presence, and tracking its location, can be difficult, but some of the techniques used for drone surveillance include radiofrequency, radar, video and acoustic technologies.
  • Drones may be equipped with built-in geofencing software, creating virtual boundaries limiting where they can fly.
  • There are also techniques that can be used to disable a drone in flight. These include physical methods such as projectiles, guns that fire a net and birds of prey trained to seize small drones from the air.
  • Non-physical methods to disable a drone include radiofrequency jamming, which can disrupt the communications link between a drone and its pilot.
  • Civilian drones must comply with existing civil aviation legislation. In the UK, this is primarily the Civil Aviation Act 1982 and the Air Navigation Order 2016 (ANO).
  • The ANO was updated in 2018 to introduce new restrictions for drones, including prohibiting small drones (up to 20 kg) from flying over 400 feet, or within 1 km of airport boundaries, and requiring operators of drones weighing 250 g or more to register with the CAA,and pilots to pass an online competency test.
  • The ANO was updated again in 2019, extending the flight restriction zone at protected aerodromes (including airports and airfields). This amendment increased the flight restriction zone around aerodrome boundaries from 1 km to 4-5 km.
  • The widespread commercial adoption of drones would require developments in technology and the legislation governing their use.
  • Widespread drone use may also raise other challenges in the future, such as contributing to noise pollution,which could become an issue if drone operations (such as delivery) become routine in urban areas.

Acknowledgements

POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:

  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Drones
  • Andre Burgess, National Physics Laboratory
  • Andrew Chadwick, Royal Aeronautical Society*
  • ARPAS UK*
  • Carla Washbourne, University College London
  • Christian Struwe, DJI*
  • Civil Aviation Authority*
  • David Guerin, Gatco*
  • David Phipps, British Model Flying Association
  • Department for Business, Energy Industrial Strategy*
  • Department for Transport*
  • Dr Anna Jackman, Royal Holloway, University of London*
  • Dr Mirko Kovac, Imperial College London
  • Dr Monica Rivas Casado, Cranfield University
  • Dr Paul Cureton, Lancaster University*
  • Dr Stephen Prior, University of Southampton*
  • Dr Stuart Dunning, Newcastle University
  • Home Office*
  • Jim Cranswick, NATS
  • Jonathan Keating, Government Office for Science
  • Karim Cosslett, Thales*
  • Kathy Nothstine, Nesta
  • Kerry Blakeman, Droneheights (formerly West Midlands Police)*
  • Mark Callaghan, Sussex Police
  • Mark Lever, Gatwick Airport*
  • Members of the POST board*
  • Ministry of Defence
  • Professor David Dunn, University of Birmingham*
  • Professor James Scanlan, University of Southampton*
  • Richard Toomer, BALPA*
  • Ricky Bhargava, Nesta*
  • Roger Gardner, University of Southampton
  • Tom Self, Wright Acoustics*

*denotes people and organisations who acted as external reviewers of the briefing.

Image copyright: Adonyi Gabor

17th January 2020
SAM IS ....
Heathrow Airport has installed a system to block drones entering its airspace

London’s Heathrow airport has deployed a system designed to block drones entering its airspace following a string of recent attempts that threatened Europe’s busiest travel hub.

The airport, classified as a flight restriction zone by authorities, is now using a product manufactured by France’s Thales SA to detect and identify drones. The French company declined Tuesday to detail the contract’s value or the precise specification being used at Heathrow.

Heathrow chose a holographic radar system developed by Aveillant Ltd., a Cambridge, England company acquired by Thales in 2017. Its technology is now part of the French defense contractor’s anti-drone solution, EagleShield.

The radar system is also used at Paris’s Charles de Gaulle airport. It can detect drones as far as 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) away in all directions, according to Aveillant’s website. Appropriate countermeasures can then be deployed.

Representatives for Thales wouldn’t say what Heathrow planned to use as a countermeasure, but said drone-disabling technology was not part of its contract with the airport.

Away from transit hubs, common solutions include the use of radio waves to jam the signal used by a pilot to control a drone, or take over control of the unit. Other methods include dispatching eagles or giant nets to pull craft out of the sky.

From Airlive.net

15th January 2020

SAM IS ....
Coptrz Counter Drone System Meets Highest CPNI Standards
Coptrz Counter Drone System – M.A.D.S has received approval by the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) with its specifications endorsed to meet Counter-UAS recommendations for Tier 1, 2 and 3.

 

After extensive testing by the CPNI, the Detect, Track and Identify Standards (DTI) have been produced to provide a baseline of requirements for counter-drone systems relating to various levels of drone protection for national critical infrastructure.

Created by ARPAS-UK Members COPTRZ – UK Commercial Drone Experts, M.A.D.S (Martek Anti-Drone System) provides detection, tracking and identification using two complementary detection systems, both of which have been confirmed as meeting the CPNI standards for DTI. The technology options are modular, allowing compliance right up to the highest tier of CPNI compliance. Utilising the detection of the radio frequency communications between the drone and the pilot, with the optional modular additions of cameras and radar, M.A.D.S. can identify the location of both the pilot and the drone. These detection events are logged in high detail with automated alerts and scheduled activity reports automatically generated with no requirement for active operator involvement.

Steve Coulson, Coptrz Managing Director said:

“We developed the M.A.D.S system with the highest level of protection in mind. We’re delighted that this announcement now confirms our integral technology in M.A.D.S is compliant to detect the UK’s most critical infrastructure. We work with a large range of UK businesses to use drones for the good, making operations safer, faster and cheaper and at the same time we help protect our customers and their assets from the potential of malicious use.”

For more information on protecting your assets download our guide HERE. 

 

From SUAS News

10th December 2019

SAM IS ....
DASA awards £2m contracts to counter hostile drone threats

Funds will develop new technology to tackle rising security risks posed by Unmanned Air Systems

DASA has announced suppliers awarded £2m for counter drone innovations

The Defence and Security Accelerator (DASA) can today announce it has awarded nearly £2m to develop new capabilities to detect, disrupt, and defeat the hostile and malicious use of drones.

Eighteen bids have been funded as part of the Countering Drones competition launched earlier this year by the then-Defence Secretary.

Among the proposal being developed are methods for detecting 4G & 5G controlled drones, cutting edge applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for sensors to automatically identify UAVs, and low risk methods of stopping drones through novel electronic defeat or interceptor solutions.

The competition, run by DASA – the MOD’s innovation hub – on behalf of Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), is the latest stage in Dstl’s ongoing research programme into countering unmanned air systems (UAS) which has been running for ten years.

The competition has also been supported by the Department for Transport and NATO to counter the rapidly evolving threats from UAS.

David Lugton, competition technical lead, said:

The introduction of Unmanned Air Systems (UAS), often referred to as drones, has been one of the most significant technological advances of recent years and represents a shift in capability of potential adversaries.

The threat from UAS has evolved rapidly and we are seeing the use of hostile improvised UAS threats in overseas theatres of operation. There is a similar problem in the UK with the malicious or accidental use of drones becoming a security challenge at events, affecting critical infrastructure and public establishments; including prisons and major UK airports.

There was a very high level of interest from industry with over 90 bids from a wide range of organisations from micro businesses, small and medium-sized enterprises, large defence firms and academia.

This led to a doubling of initial funding from around £1m to around £2m being awarded to organisations in Phase 1.

The first phase of this competition is intended to demonstrate proof of concepts that can be further developed and integrated during later phases.

Phase 2 is planned to launch next year with a focus on developing and maturing successful research into integrated solutions

The 18 projects funded around £100,000 each are:

  • Airspeed Electronics Ltd – to develop an artificial intelligence detection system which uses acoustic sensors.
  • Animal Dynamics – to develop UAS swarm system to detect and neutralise.Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV) by employing peregrine falcon attack strategies.
  • Autonomous Devices Limited – to develop interception technology.
  • BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Ltd – to develop electromagnetic defeat of UAS.
  • BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Ltd – to develop passive radar for detection of UAVs.
  • Cubica Technology Ltd – to develop an automatic recognition and targeting system of UAVs from large distances.
  • MBDA UK Ltd – to demonstrate an integrated system to detect, track and intercept hostile drones.
  • Northrop Grumman – to develop UAS defeat using cyber and sensor vulnerabilities.
  • Northumbria University – to develop anti-swarm drone technology.
  • PA Consulting – to develop a detection system against cellular controlled UAS.
  • Plextek Services Limited – to develop detection and signal jamming capability for UAS.
  • Plextek Services Limited – to develop miniature Counter-UAS radar.
  • QinetiQ – to develop a drone tracking system in complex environments.
  • QinetiQ – to develop a ‘hard kill’ for disrupting the UAV’s on board electronics.
  • RiskAware Ltd – to develop an automated drone identification and target tracking system.
  • Thales UK – to develop a machine learning for Counter-UAS radar.
  • University College London – to develop signal processing and machine.learning algorithms to identify drones in areas highly populated by birds.
  • An additional proposal, subject to contract.

Phase 1 of the competition is due to run until summer 2020.

DASA and Dstl will be hosting a collaboration day for the Countering Drones competition on Thursday 28 November 2019 in London.

Representatives from industry and academia interested in making collaborative bids for Phase 2 of the competition can register their interest in attending the event here.

Note that numbers at the event are limited and those who express an interest will be selected to attend depending on their skills and experience.